四川新春促消费：推出10亿元“大礼包” 强化春节市场供应******
中新网成都1月17日电 (单鹏)四川省人民政府新闻办17日在成都举行“欢乐川味年——品质消费 年味四川”新闻发布会。会上透露，为繁荣春节消费市场，四川政企同向推出春节消费“大礼包”：四川省计划投入10亿元，发动3万家企业，开展4000场活动。
据介绍，为促进消费回暖，去年5月，四川出台“消费6条”，鼓励四川市州面向餐饮、零售等受疫情影响严重的行业发放消费券。截至去年12月底，四川21个市州共计发放消费券13.8亿元，直接拉动消费171亿元，“总体看消费券作用还是比较明显。”四川省商务厅副厅长陈友清表示。
为促进消费复元活血，针对今年一季度季节性特点，配合“年味四川”氛围营造，四川省商务厅再次推出新一轮促进消费的五条政策，包括发放消费券，对汽车、家电家装进行购置补贴，在条件具备路段适当设置夜间临时停车点等具体惠民措施。
“‘消费新5条’含金量高、‘诱惑力’强，既有真金白银的投入，也有放开外摆摊位、临时停车限制等亲民便民举措；既有综合性普惠性的消费券发放，也有对汽车、家电、家居、餐饮等传统消费‘四大金刚’的聚焦。”陈友清表示，当前四川各地正在抓紧制订实施细则，预计今年一季度四川省财力将投入5亿元，合力提振消费信心。
今年春节期间，部分领域消费预计率先走热。万达商管四川分公司总经理边康宁表示，在零售方面，满足市民年货采购需求的零食、服饰、家居，以及犒劳自己和家人的数码、黄金珠宝都是春节前最早开始旺销的商品。
“从我们最近餐饮销售情况来看，已经基本恢复到2019年疫情前的水平。”据边康宁介绍，从上周开始，团年饭已经逐渐火热起来。此外在文化娱乐方面，今年电影和体验业态火爆，春节期间《中国乒乓》《流浪地球2》《满江红》等7部大片集中上映，14日部分电影已经开启预售，预售情况火爆。
同时，为强化春节市场供应保障，四川各级商务主管部门加强节日期间蔬菜、肉蛋等生活必需品市场监测，发挥四川2000多家应急保供骨干企业作用，加强货源组织、区域联保、物流配送，确保生活必需品供应不脱销、不断档。
成都农产品批发市场有限公司总经理王驭未表示，已提前组织商户加大货源储备，结合四川市民饮食喜好及近期时令产品，引导商户增加了进口海鲜、进口水果、香肠腊肉、干货副食等品类，丰富市民春节餐桌供应，现阶段市场日均可供应蔬菜超3200吨、肉类1000吨、水产海鲜1600吨，米面粮油储备约6000吨，各品类供应充足、价格趋于平稳。
四川省发改委副主任李明騄表示，近期加大市场监测力度，密切关注粮油肉蛋菜等重要民生商品市场供应和价格形势，启动节日期间应急监测制度，及时发现苗头性问题并作出安排。提前研判不利天气可能对重要民生商品生产流通的影响，认真查找保供稳价工作中的薄弱环节和风险隐患。强化储备调节，全面梳理本地成品粮油、猪肉等重要民生商品储备情况，根据市场价格形势变化择机投放，及时增加市场供应。及时足额发放价格临时补贴，鼓励有条件的地方向困难民众增发一次性补贴，积极保障困难民众基本生活。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 网投彩票地图 |
