浙江丽水：擦亮健康底色，以数字化改革提升服务力******
时值严冬，呼吸道疾病感染进入高发期。在浙江省丽水市莲都区大港头镇官岭村，山区村民足不出村，即可在家门口的“流动发热门诊”就诊取药。
近日，2022年度全国爱国卫生运动大会在北京举行。在大会的健康城市主题分会上，丽水市副市长卢彩柳作“倡导文明健康助力健康城市建设”典型经验分享时介绍，丽水打造的“智慧流动医院”，实现了758个未设医疗机构的偏远行政村全覆盖。
早在2018年，丽水市创新建立了“流动医院”巡回诊疗山区模式，此后运用数字化技术加以升级改造。近期，当地基于46辆“智慧流动医院”巡回诊疗车（以下简称“智慧流动医院”），按需开设“流动发热门诊”。
地处浙南山区的丽水，生态环境状况指数连续18年位居浙江省首位。记者了解到，丽水市已连续两年获评全国健康城市建设样板市，除了良好的生态环境，以数字化改革提升服务水平，是当地建设“健康丽水”的重要手段。
经过升级改造的“智慧流动医院”，除了可进行常规的血压、血糖检查，还能实现心电图、尿检、B超等项目。尤为关键的是，智慧车载系统配备5G网络，通过打通医保系统，安装移动结算系统，在车内就可以实现医保刷卡结算，挂号收费、就医、检查、取药、医保报销、家庭医生签约、公共卫生服务等并网运行，让山区群众在家门口就能享受到县级医院的门诊服务。
新冠肺炎疫情防控期间，“智慧流动医院”曾数次驶入封控区，保障隔离群众看病买药需求。如2022年3月至4月，丽水莲都区岩泉街道蔚蓝水岸小区相关区域被划定疫情防控“三区”，莲都区当即协调“智慧流动医院”定期驻点开诊。
彼时，群众通过“浙里办”平台的“智慧流动医院”服务端，进入“需求反馈”界面，提出就医需求，区域基层医疗机构就能在“丽水市智慧流动医院管理监测平台”收到群众信息，提前安排出诊医生，为群众提供“点单式”服务，按需备好检查设备、药品、医疗物资等。
2022年7月，丽水市卫健委打造的“救在丽水”应用，在“浙里办”平台正式上线，通过构建多跨协同、高效便捷的山区医疗急救服务模式，进一步畅通山区群众“就医通道”。
记者了解到，该应用整合了丽水全市233家医疗机构、127辆院前急救车、46个流动医院、524台AED等资源，打通卫健、公安、医保等8个部门数据壁垒，集成双向定位、上车即入院等19个信息模块和1121个数据项目。
据介绍，“救在丽水”通过构建“身边救”“同步救”“精准救”“全域救”“全程救”5个场景，将原先急救流程中4个线下人工环节整合为线上一体化流程，将原来车上只能做体征监测模式提升为同步会诊模式，救治成功率从96%提升至98%，院前心肺复苏成功率从1.12%提升至2.26%。
2022年以来，“救在丽水”已参与执行急救任务45614次，促使全市急救服务半径从32公里缩小至19公里、平均急救反应时间从34分钟减少至18分钟，被评为浙江省数字社会系统2022年度“最佳应用”。
丽水市爱卫办相关负责人介绍，近年来，丽水实施健康优先发展战略，创新健康城市综合管理智慧化监管模式，依托“花园云”城市大脑，建成了健康城市管理体系，打通共享卫生健康、市场监管、行政执法、建设等部门数据，推动城市管理、食品安全、卫生监督等重点领域数字化智慧监管。
该负责人表示，接下来，丽水将进一步贯彻“将健康融入所有政策”“人民共建共享”的工作方针，将爱国卫生运动与传染病、慢性病防控等紧密结合，全面改善人居环境，坚持数字化改革，全力构建丽水山区医疗模式，为群众提供更普惠的医疗服务。（洪恒飞 赖英映 科技日报记者 江耘）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 网投彩票地图 |
